Product Solutions Pricing About Blog
BETA BaseLD.com is under active development. Features and pricing may change. Request Access »

If you don't work in real estate or civil engineering, the word "entitlement" probably means nothing to you. In land development, it means something specific: the legal permission to build what someone wants to build on a particular piece of land. Not the construction itself. The process of getting there.

The short version: permission to build.

Entitlement is the umbrella term for everything that happens between "we want to build this" and "we're legally allowed to." That includes zoning review, site plan or subdivision approval, and civil engineering review of grading, drainage, utilities, and access, all checked against a jurisdiction's code before a single building permit gets pulled. Skip any piece of it and a project can't legally break ground, no matter how ready the design is.

It's rarely just one approval.

Most projects touch multiple approvals, not one: a rezoning if the current zoning doesn't allow the intended use, a site plan or subdivision plat, and a civil engineering review covering stormwater, roads, utilities, and grading. Each one can trigger its own round of comments, revisions, and resubmittals, sometimes running in parallel, sometimes staged in sequence depending on the jurisdiction.

Three parties, one process.

Entitlement work almost always involves at least three separate companies: a civil engineering firm designing the site and preparing submittals, a developer financing the project and driving the schedule, and a jurisdiction's planning or public works department reviewing everything for code compliance. None of them report to the other two, and in most cases none of them share a single system to track where things actually stand.

Why it takes so long.

Entitlement timelines range from a few months for a straightforward project to multiple years for anything contested or complex, and the delay is rarely the technical review itself. It's coordination: a submittal sitting unopened at a jurisdiction, a comment that got addressed on a phone call but never written down, a resubmittal that references the wrong version of a plan set. Every week that drags on costs the developer real carrying costs and costs the engineering firm real hours re-explaining status to people who already asked last week.

What actually moves it forward.

The projects that move fastest through entitlement aren't necessarily the simplest ones. They're the ones where all three parties can see the same current status without a phone call: whose review a submittal is sitting in, which comments are still open, which round is the current one. That's the exact gap BaseLD is built to close: a single shared record of a project's entitlement status that the engineering firm, the developer, and the jurisdiction can all see at once.

If your firm, your development company, or your jurisdiction is tracking entitlement status across email threads and spreadsheets, we'd like to show you a better way.

Join us

Be part of building the standard.

Early access is open to civil engineering firms, developers, and jurisdictions.

Suggestion or Issue